| (no subject) |
[Jul. 5th, 2009|12:34 pm] |
As I was perusing one of the forums I frequent (The Wittenberg Trail), I came across one blog entry by a person who was somewhat distressed because his church had what he called "a patriotic service." He listed all the "hymns" that were sung that morning, such as "The Star Spangled Banner", "My Country, Tis of Thee", "Battle Hymn of the Republic", and "America, the Beautiful". Even the Communion hymn was replaced with "American Soldier."
I responded to this post by pointing out which hymns I felt would be appropriate for a Sunday on or near the Fourth of July. They included songs like "Crown Him with Many Crowns", "The Church's One Foundation", "Christ is our Cornerstone", and "Christ by Heavenly Hosts Adored".
I went on to tell him that, if they sang a patriotic song during the Sacrament of the Altar, I would leave, and say, "Sorry, but you're worshiping the wrong god."
Now, patriotism is fine for civic events and national holiday celebrations, but the Divine Service of God's House is not here for patriotism. It is here to proclaim Christ crucified and risen from the dead for sinners, not to promote good ol' USA.
And don't give me that crap about America being founded on religious principles or to promote religious freedom. The American Revolution was fought on account of the true god of America: money. That's right; study your history: the American Revolution took place because of taxes. It had nothing to do with religion or religious freedom whatsoever.
"But what about George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson? They were such upstanding Christian men!" No they weren't. All three of them renounced the Christian creed, and while they did to some extent live by a semblance of Christian morality (well, sort of), none of them were in any meaningful sense of the word Christian. So don't give me all that "original intent" and "God's manifest will" and all. Religious pluralism was built into the very fabric of the Constitution; we just haven't seen it radically manifested until recent decades, and really hadn't been a problem until the huge influx of Islam. But either way, the job of the government has never been to uphold or proclaim the Christian creed; that is the job of the Holy Christian Church.
And that's just it: it is the job of the Holy Christian Church to proclaim Christ crucified for sinners. So when churches set that message aside to indulge patriotic sentiments, then they are basically booting Jesus off His throne and letting Uncle Sam take His place. How tragic, considering that this same Uncle Sam is the one who openly promotes all sorts of anti-Christian vices, such as pornography, abortion, and homosexuality. Why should we let that charlatan take the place of the true Lord of Life?
But before anyone goes and accuses me of being a traitor, I will say this: patriotism does have its place. And that place is in the vocation of the citizen, that is, the public life all of us have as citizens of this nation. And as Christians, we should be thankful for the land we have been given which, for the present time, does have laws that allow us to practice our faith in accordance with God's Word. But this is a left-hand kingdom responsibility, and should never be allowed to supplant our right-hand kingdom duty to honor, praise, and confess the True God as He is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord.
So on this, the Fifth Sunday after Pentecost - not the Sunday of the Fourth of July Weekend - remember who it is who is truly in command. And dear Christian, remember where your primary citizenship belongs - not to this temporal nation, but to the holy nation, the royal priesthood, the chosen people of God, who called you out of darkness of sin and death to dwell in His kingdom of light. |
|
|
| St. Paul writes in the first chapter of Romans |
[Jul. 3rd, 2009|12:51 am] |
|
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. 28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them. |
|
|
| Transformers 2 |
[Jul. 2nd, 2009|11:43 pm] |
I just got home from seeing Transformers 2. It was okay, but honestly, not quite as good as I was expecting it to be.
This one suffered from a few problems which I found to be a distraction from the enjoyment of the story.
Where do I begin? How about at the beginning?
I found the interaction between Sam and his family to be really annoying. And frankly, I was hoping it would end quickly to get on with the real story, but it didn't. It dragged out for a while.
And while the first movie in the series was crass in a few places, this one seemed to turn crass almost at every turn, almost to the point of disgusting a few times. None of which was really funny, and none of it really contributed to the story at all.
And while I won't go into details, it appears the Decepticons have their own equivalent of the T-1000. That situation, while certainly adding to some of the dramatic tension, seemed too awkward, overblown, and just plain annoying.
There were some pretty intense action sequences, but honestly, I found it hard to follow what was going on at times. The camera work, particularly the close angles and the fast pacing, made it really difficult to really see what was happening in the fight scenes. That, and after a while, it seems all the Transformers started to look too much alike, making it hard to tell who was fighting and who was winning.
The story was pretty decent, though not terribly original. And it seemed to contain information somewhat contradictory to the first, though not irreconcilably so.
If Michael Bay were to make a third (and I bet he will - and I bet it will feature Unicron), here's some advice I would give him: Give all the robots some paint jobs, so we can tell who's who. Use more slow-mo in the more intense scenes - the action is visually spectacular, but if it doesn't give us a good idea of what is happening, it's defeating the purpose. And don't resort to potty humor so much - a tiny bit here and there is okay, but you can't make a whole movie about it: it gets creepy after a while.
Overall, it was an okay movie. It didn't blow me away like the first one did, but it tried really hard. Almost too hard. Personally, I kinda wish I had waited for it to come out on DVD. |
|
|
| Silly Snake Pictures |
[Jun. 23rd, 2009|02:42 pm] |







*Pinkies are newborn mice, one of the garter snake's favorite foods. And yes, I'm sure that's where the cartoon character got his name. NARF!

I didn't come up with this one, but it was too funny to pass up:

|
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jun. 16th, 2009|11:45 pm] |
THIS is why I came to despise most "contemporary Christian" music.
|
|
|
| I miss Batman: The Animated Series. |
[Jun. 14th, 2009|12:35 pm] |
|
I miss Batman: The Animated Series.
That show rocked!
Now, think back to the early 1990's. Tim Burton had just released his live action rendition of Batman in theaters. I wasn't exactly a huge fan of the Burton movies, but they did at least try to take the Dark Knight aspect of Batman's character seriously, unlike the old Adam West show I grew up with. He was a complex character, driven by an overwhelming sense of duty and a desire for vengeance, not some campy Caped Crusader with a utility belt with a Bat Alphabet Soup Container.
But I couldn't help but sneer at the second Burton movie. Mostly because, where his first movie was a few steps in the right direction, the second one seemed to me a few steps backwards. For one thing, he took two of Batman's oldest and most well known foes - Cat Woman and the Penguin - and did strange things with them. How do I describe it? You know how in some movies or works of literature, the author might take something mystical and mysterious and explain it too much, so that it is no longer weird and mystical anymore (yeah, I'm looking at you, George Lucas!)? Here, Burton did the opposite. From what I remember, Cat Woman was just an ordinary burglar, incredibly skilled and with a prevailing cat motif, but still an ordinary woman. And the Penguin was just an incredibly charismatic and intelligent criminal mastermind, who went with more of a high-class style and something of a bird motif, but still just an ordinary man. What does Burton do with them? Cat Woman was a secretary who dies and is resurrected by cats, and the Penguin is a mutant who lives in the sewers and controls birds with his mind. Ooookaaaay! :S
The point is, in my mind, even though Burton seemed to try to push the Batman franchise into a more serious direction, it still had that camp that I remembered from the 1960's Adam West show and the 1970's cartoon shows (which includes not only the Batman and Robin show, but also The Super Friends and Scooby Doo).
Then along came the Animated Series. And of course, at first, I sneered at it, too. If I wasn't that keen on the Burton movies, what would possibly appeal to me about this version presented in yet another kids' cartoon?
Boy, was I in for a surprise!
This show was amazing! Basically, it took Burton's work and perfected it. The show was dark, and its imagery definitely inspired by the visuals from the Burton movies (even the Penguin's deformed character design). Gotham City was in fact just that: GOTHIC! While it takes many of its visual queues from the movies, its animation style was quite unique: the best way to describe it would be 1940's retro. It doesn't try overly hard to be realistic, but rather adopts its own unique visual feel, so to speak. This, of course, was before most kids' action cartoons started trying to copy Japanese manga style animation.
And the titular character himself? No more reliance on Bat Alphabet Soup Containers and Bat Shark Repellent and Bat Dry Martini Stirrers. This Batman was just one butt-kicking machine! True, he did occasionally resort to some simplified gadgetry - like his famous grappling hook gun - but he relied on his strength, fighting skills, and intelligence to get the job done. And when he threw a punch, villains hit the ground, without all the brightly colored words flying out the TV screen. He kicked butt, and that's all there was to it.
And what's more, this show had some excellent writing. Very few of the stories weren't highly engaging to the viewer. Just let me see if I can sum up some of my favorite and most memorable episodes:
In one, Batman needs the help of one particular gangster to bring down one of Gotham's biggest crime lords. But to convince this gangster to help him, he has to confront him with the effects of his sins and help him to find redemption. The climax of the story is when he takes him to see his brother, a priest who lost his leg trying to save his wayward brother when they were little boys. I know, my brief summary doesn't do justice to the sheer emotional scope of the episode, but it is one well worth watching. In the end, the gangster learns that the best things in life can't be gotten by power, money, strength, or intimidation, but often take true courage and sacrifice to obtain.
In another favorite episode, Bruce Wayne finds himself living a perfect life. His parents never died, and his life is going very well (though for some odd reason he seems to have trouble reading). Strangely enough, there does seem to be a Batman - a different character - terrorizing Gotham's underworld. Bruce finds himself having to confront this Batman in order to find out who he is and what is wrong with the world around him.
And of course, I can't leave out one of the greatest Batman movies ever made: The Mask of the Phantasm.
Using the same style of animation and writing as the series, this movie in my mind stands out well beyond the live action movies, especially when you consider how badly Joel Shumacher began to mess them up in later years. This movie was something of a retelling of Batman's origins - how he discovered the caves beneath his family mansion which would become his secret lair, how he decided to use the image of the bat to terrify criminals, and how he finally decided to don the mask that would forever strike fear into the hearts of the Gotham underworld - all while exploring his inner conflicts - his desire for happiness versus his sense of duty to fight crime. But that's not all: it also tells the story of another masked vigilante, who was inspired by Batman, and who now is killing off Gotham's most notorious criminals one by one. On account of mistaken identity - as well as some intrigue within the Gotham government - Batman, who had always been considered a loose cannon vigilante, is declared a full-blown criminal fugitive and is hunted by the police. But as if that weren't enough, the Joker is also after him for killing some of his business partners. All these numerous forces clash - Batman, the police, the Gotham city council, the mysterious masked vigilante, the Gotham cirminal underworld, and the Joker, not to mention Bruce Wayne's personal life - creating an extremely intense and intriguing plot that finally culminates in a three-way showdown between the self-proclaimed Angel of Death, the Joker, and Batman. And just who is this Angel of Death, you ask? All I'll say is that the Joker figures it out.
When this movie came out, I didn't expect much from it. But wow! This Joker is so psychotic and devious, he makes the Jack Nicholson portrayal in the Burton film seem tame by comparison (though Heath Ledger does give him a run for his money). And Mark Hamill - that's right, Luke Skywalker - does a brilliant job of voicing him. And the Angel of Death himself: he's dark, creepy, and bent on destroying the Gotham City underworld.
If you have never seen this film, THEN WHAT THE CRAP IS WRONG WITH YOU?? Go buy it now!
Anyway, Batman: the Animated Series shows what a good action cartoon can be when good writers and artists take their work seriously, instead of just slopping stuff together for the kiddies. If only more American animation studios worked this hard to produce good shows for both kids and adults. It just goes to show, the Japanese don't have a monopoly on mature, engaging, and artistically great action cartoons.
|
|
|
| The Feast of the Holy Trinity |
[Jun. 7th, 2009|03:02 pm] |
|
Text: Isaiah 6:1-8 Title: Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts It was the year that King Uzziah died. By earthly standards, Uzziah was a pretty decent king. His military build-up helped to drastically improve Judah’s homeland security, and his policies helped to boost the national economy. All of this made him a fairly likeable king. He did make one fatal mistake, though. He wanted to play priest. So one day, he decided to bust into the temple in an attempt to burn incense at the altar of God, something that only priests were authorized to do. For punishment, he was struck with leprosy, all for attempting to usurp the priestly office. But now, the king had died. This great and mighty lord of the land was no more. And in the midst of the grief and sorrow, the Lord God gives His prophet Isaiah a vision of Himself, to show who is really in charge. The king of Judah may be gone, but the King of Heaven and Earth was still on His throne. Earthly kings may live and die, and earthly kingdoms may rise and fall, but the Lord of the Universe reigns over all forever and ever. Isaiah sees this grand vision of the glory of the Lord. He sees Lord YHWH seated high upon His throne, with His magnificent robe filling the temple. Around this throne flew these glorious creatures of fire, the Seraphim, covering their faces with their wings, bowing before the Lord and praising Him, saying, “Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts! Heaven and earth are full of His glory!” What a grand and glorious vision it must have been! Tell me, what do you think it would be like to see such a sight? Would you want to be standing in Isaiah’s shoes at that moment, to catch a glimpse of God’s wondrous glory? How do you think you would feel if you were standing there right now? I can tell you how Isaiah felt: he was terrified! And I can’t say I blame him, either! Just look at what was happening around him! The foundations of the earth were shaking. The temple was filling with smoke and fire. And around the throne, those magnificent fiery creatures of immense grace, even they couldn’t look directly at the sight before them, but hid their faces from the Lord’s presence. People today like to think that they want to see God’s glory, but that’s because they think of God’s glory as something light and fluffy, like rainbows and fairies, unicorns and pink puppies, and tinkly harp music; not earthquakes, smoke, and fiery monsters; and not the big booming voice that shook the very temple to its foundations. Let me make this clear: you do not want to see God in His full glory. It would destroy you. Even the Seraphim dared not look directly upon Him. His brightness was like the sun. Everyone likes the sun, right? Especially on cool wintry days, or wet rainy days, or in the darkest depths of night. But what about in the middle of July? Or in the middle of a desert? Or on the planet Mercury? I bet you wouldn’t like the sun too much there. So it is with the presence of God: unmediated, it is too intense for us to bear, as Isaiah fully knows. Notice: this is YHWH Sabaoth, the God of Armies. This is the Lord as a mighty warrior, clad in his shining armor, holding his gleaming shield, armed with his mighty sword, come to do battle against His enemies. And why has He come to Isaiah? To declare war. You know, there seem to be lots of hymns based on this text, a couple of them in our hymnal. Most of them seem to be very missional: God setting apart someone to proclaim His mercy and grace. And they’re all wonderful songs. Too bad they all get it dead wrong. God is not sending Isaiah to declare His mercy and love; He’s sending Isaiah to declare war on these obstinate, stiff-necked people who have dishonored His name. Just listen to what General YWHW, Commander of the Heavenly Armies has to say: “Go, and say to this people: “‘Keep on hearing, but do not understand; keep on seeing, but do not perceive.’ Make the heart of this people dull, and their ears heavy, and blind their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.” Then Isaiah said, “How long, O Lord?” And he said: “Until cities lie waste without inhabitant, and houses without people, and the land is a desolate waste, and the Lord removes people far away, and the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land. And though a tenth remain in it, it will be burned again, like a terebinth or an oak, whose stump remains when it is felled.” The holy seed is its stump. Wow. I bet you won’t hear that text preached at an ordination service. But at seeing all this – the fire and smoke, the earthquake, these terrifying creatures of fire, and the thrice-holy Lord of Armies seated upon His throne, how did Isaiah react? He fell on his face and cried out, “Woe is me, for I am lost!” Or to use modern language, “Uh oh! I’m dead meat!” Isaiah knew that, as a sinner, there was no way he could stand a chance in the presence of this thrice-holy God. So he falls on his face and confesses his sin: “I am a man of unclean lips, among a people of unclean lips.” He knew he was a sinner, and he did the only thing a sinner can do – the only thing any of us can do – when confronted with the glory of holy God: fall on your knees and repent. Confess your sins before Him and beg for forgiveness. “Woe is me, for I am undone! I am a man of unclean lips!” But then, something amazing happens. One of those burning creatures approaches. In his hand, he carries a burning coal from the altar. With it, he touches Isaiah’s lips and says, “Behold, this has touched your lips. Your guilt is taken away, and your sin atoned for.” What have we just seen? Confession and absolution. We saw this very drama play out before our eyes just a few minutes ago. When we came into this holy place and confessed our sin before God our Father, He heard our confession and took away our guilt. As the Scriptures say, “If we confess our sin, God is faithful and just to forgive us our sin and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” But how is it that Isaiah’s sins are forgiven and his guilt cleansed? How are our sins forgiven and our guilt cleansed? Notice that it was a coal from the altar of the Lord. This was a place of sacrifice, where lambs were slaughtered that their blood might cover over the sins of the people. And this coal was placed on Isaiah’s lips. Where do we see this happening today? In a few minutes, we will join in that heavenly song that the Seraphim sing around the throne of God, the Trisagion, or as we like to call it, the Sanctus: “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God of Sabaoth! Heaven and earth are full of Thy glory!” But that is not where the Sanctus ends. We then sing “Hosanna in the Highest! Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!” The imagery is changing. It begins with the King of Glory seated on His throne, the conquering Lord who commands the heavenly armies. But then it changes to Jesus riding into Jerusalem, just days before He is to die, riding on the back of a humble little donkey. Not as a mighty warlord, but as a humble servant of all mankind. Then we sing the Agnus Dei: “O Christ, Thou Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world, have mercy upon us.” We receive forgiveness by Jesus Christ sacrificing Himself before His Father to atone for our sins. And in a few minutes, I’m going to walk over to that altar and pick something up. It won’t look like that hot coal carried by that Seraph, but it will be just as powerful with the presence of our God. It will look like ordinary bread and wine, but will in fact be the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. And when that bread and wine touch your lips, your guilt will be taken away, and your sins atoned for in this simple act of feeding. This drama that Isaiah sees before him in the temple, we see played out every time we gather for this sacred meal. We sing the Sanctus – “Holy, Holy, Holy!” – and in doing so, we join the heavenly armies in praising our mighty King. We sing “Hosanna in the Highest! Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!” remembering that our Lord Jesus is coming to us, not with great power and glory, but hidden in the humble forms of bread and wine. And when we sing, “O Christ, Thou Lamb of God”, we remember Him who offered His life as a sacrifice to atone for our sin, showing us His mercy in His cross. He is now the Passover Lamb who feeds us His own body and blood, that touch our lips and take away our guilt. And we do not forget that Sacred Fire, the Holy Spirit who ignites in us the fires of faith, the Holy Spirit who opened Isaiah’s mouth to speak the oracles of God, and who now opens our mouth to speak the life-giving Word of Christ. This is the Feast of the Holy Trinity. We give thanks unto God our Father, who created us and gives us all we need to sustain this life, and who demonstrated His perfect love for us in sending His only begotten Son to die for us. We give thanks unto Jesus Christ, His Son, our Lord, who took upon Himself our sins, purchased and won us with His own precious blood, to make us His own, and who continues to feed us His true Body and Blood in this holy Sacrament. And we give thanks to the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of life, who calls us by the Gospel, enlightens us with His gifts, and sanctifies and keeps us in the true faith in Christ Jesus our Lord. This Holy Trinity – One God in Three Persons – grant you his peace that surpasses all human understanding to guard your heart and mind in Christ Jesus our Lord.
 St. Athanasius, defender of the orthodox confession of the Holy Trinity. |
|
|
| Terminator: Salvation |
[May. 29th, 2009|12:06 am] |
This movie was AWEXXXOME!! Much better than I anticipated.
I mean, I figured there would be plenty of action, splosions, stuff gittin' blowed up real good, and all that. But wow! There was plenty of action, but what really threw me for a loop was the story. Great plot, nice character development, some really nice surprizes.
And believe it or not, The Governator makes an appearance in it! That's right, AHNULD'S BACK!
If you're a Terminator fan, go see it! If not, then go see it anyway! |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 28th, 2009|08:22 am] |
Those of you who have seen THIS will know why I find this sign hilarious.

Not one, not two, not three, not five...
|
|
|
| Buffets |
[May. 27th, 2009|12:10 pm] |
I have decided I'm going to stop eating at buffets. And probably not for the reasons you might immediately expect.
What I find is that buffet food tends not to be good quality, often not as good as the same food you might order off the menu.
A few months back, I made a point to stop at an Indian restaurant in Montgomery for lunch. They were serving buffet style at the time, and so I went with that. But the buffet selection was quite limited - only a very few varieties of curry, and none of them really that good. When I was done eating, I felt completely dissatisfied. When I eat Indian food, I expect it to be bold and flavorful, not bland and uninspiring. Now, I'm willing to bet that if I had ordered off the menu, I would have gotten much better food, and probably for about the same price.
The same goes for the local Chinese buffet place. They do have a much larger selection of foods, but I still find that the buffet tends to be lackluster in its flavor, and often overcooked. This place only does buffet, so I would expect better from them, but I do not go there anymore at all.
And the local Pizza Hut, too. The pizza was just okay, nothing great, and, more importantly, not as good as it would have been if I had just ordered a pizza to go.
Overall, I am just not impressed with buffets anymore. I feel that I'm paying more for more food, but I'm still getting ripped off, because the food isn't as good as it should be. This, in turn, leaves the end of my meal feeling quite unsatisfying, no matter how much I eat. What a waste of gluttony!
In conclusion, I think it is much better to have a regular-sized meal of good tasting and wholesome food than to stuff your face with mediocre food. It just feels way more satisfying. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 26th, 2009|10:07 pm] |
You know, I'm getting really tired of map software that can't seem to parse an address right. Google Maps, Mapquest, Micro$oft Streets and Trips: they all have the exact same problem - nearly 3/4 of the addresses I'm looking for in smaller towns are mapped incorrectly.
Here's my solution: instead of just giving street addresses for businesses, they should also list GPS coordinates. That way, you know exactly where on the map you're trying to get to, and the software won't trick you into going the wrong way. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 25th, 2009|12:50 pm] |
I was discussing the Liturgy with my confirmand (who will be confirmed this coming Sunday - YAY!), and I noticed an interesting thing in the Communion rite. The Sanctus begins with the thrice-holy praise of YHWH Sabaoth, that is, the Lord of Armies. The image is that of the Lord, dressed in shining armor, with his gleaming shield and mighty sword, coming to do battle to save His people.
But then, it transitions to "Hosanna!", and the image is that of Christ riding a lowly donkey into the city of Jerusalem, just days before He is to die. Here, we have the Soldier of Soldiers, off to do combat in which He will win the victory, but only by being mortally wounded. The great victory He wins for us will look like a humiliating defeat for Him.
Then, after the Lord's Prayer, comes the Agnus Dei. The Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world, who feeds us His own flesh and blood for the forgiveness of our sins. This same Lamb will return someday to fight yet another battle: one in which He will utterly destroy all the enemies of His people.
I remember once doing a presentation in Dr. Nagel's class about the name Pantocrator, in which I pointed out that our God is in fact a God of War, a very unpopular image today, but that this is a God who fights on behalf of His people. Dr. Nagel's response: "Who are we to tell the Lord God how to do His Lord Godding?"
"The LORD is a warrior; the LORD is His name" (Exodus 15:3). |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 23rd, 2009|06:36 am] |
Remember a couple months ago, I posted a series of entries about what "having a relationship with God" really means?
Here's an episode of Issues Etc. that speaks of the very same topic.
|
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 20th, 2009|04:01 pm] |
Today, I picked up a snake by hand.
Earlier this morning, I had been talking to my landlady and her gardener about catching snakes. A little while later, the gardener came up and told me he had found a snake. I grabbed my trash can and Gopher and headed around to nab him. It was then that the gardener told me he had stomped on the snake to kill it. Freaking jerk sounded like he was actually bragging!
Anyway, I found the poor critter, probably just over a foot long, coiled up, not moving, with his mouth opened and bleeding. I figured he was dead. But when I picked him up, he moved. His mouth still hung open, and I could see he was still bleeding. I told my landlady that he was injured, but that if he was hurt too badly, I would put him out of his misery.
Anyway, I donned a pair of rubber gloves and picked the little fella and checked him out. His mouth was closed, but there was a tiny bit of bleeding still there. But otherwise, he seemed fine. But he seemed really anxious (wouldn't you?), so I put him back in the trash can and let him bury himself under some leaves.
Later, I took him and one of his larger brothers (a good 3.5ft. long one - just like the other big ones I've caught) and let them go near the woods where I released the other snakes. The big one took off quickly into the brush at the edge of the woods, but the little one was still being shy. I picked him up again - he was hard to catch, too - but I never could get a good grip on him. As soon as I got this pic of him, he took off - straight for the road. I tried to herd him back toward the woods, and finally coaxed him with the Gopher and the bottom of my boot (just to block him, of course) into going toward the woods. He disappeared into a pile of grass clippings near the edge of the woods.
  
I really hope he's not permanently injured from the gardener's lame attempt at killing him.
|
|
|
| Islam: A Religion of Peace. |
[May. 19th, 2009|09:00 pm] |
Islam: A Religion of Peace.
Also, why is it that when anyone brings up the Crusades, they seem to forget the Muslim Turks invaded first? In fact, throughout the late medieval period, and even into the Renaissance, the Turks were constantly trying to conquer Europe, and almost did on several occasions. But no one seems to remember that: just that the Christians fought Crusades in an attempt to defend their fellow Christians against Muslim scimitars, and that somehow makes us the bad guys.
|
|
|
| Happy Council of Nicea Day! |
[May. 19th, 2009|08:27 pm] |
Today marks the 1684th anniversary of the Council of Nicea.
I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of His Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the virgin Mary and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried. And the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures and ascended into heaven and sitteth at the right hand of the Father. And He shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spake by the prophets. And I believe in one holy Christian and apostolic Church, I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins, and I look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen. |
|
|
| Ophidiophobia. |
[May. 16th, 2009|06:43 pm] |
Well, I think I have adequately overcome my ophidiophobia now. Within the past month, I've gone from being totally creeped out by the mere sight of them on my bushes, to facing down a snarling, 3.5 foot thamnophis sirtalis. Yep, I'd say I've made some progress.
But there's still one thing I haven't done yet, and that's pick one up with my hand. The Gopher is one thing, but I'm still not brave enough to actually touch the boogers yet. Of course, the fear may be somewhat warranted: their venom may not be toxic to humans, but I still don't want to get bitten.
Anyway, so far, Tom's Catch-and-Release program has rescued 7 garters and 2 turtles (no, I wasn't afraid of turtles - except maybe snappers, but who isn't afraid of those?).
There's the latest catch, from yesterday.

He was a good 3.5 feet long, about the same size as that other big one from the other day. He was pretty ferocious, too. After I got him into the trash can, he kept striking at the Gopher and trying to jump out. But once I got him to the woods, he calmed down, and seemed to know I was going to release him. Instead, he just stretched himself out as straight as he could, reaching for the top of the trash can as I gently tipped it over. Once I got it on the ground, he crawled straight out, and just calmly stared at me. When I turned around to get the camera, he was gone.
|
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 12th, 2009|05:41 pm] |
Here's some pics: This one was pretty big. Didn't like me too much either.   This one here was kinda small - probably about a foot and a half long. He was in there with the big one in the previous pics.  Here's the big one after I released him into the wild. The small one is there, too, but he wasn't too visible. Notice that he's not terribly happy at all. Unlike the others, he didn't scurry away, but stood there waiting for me to get close enough for a bite.  This one was pretty long - at least 3 feet - but really skinny. I caught this one of my neighbor's bush as I was speaking to her, and telling her about the others I had caught. There was another one on the same bush, but it got away.  Even after I let him go, he was just so curious, he had to come back and take another look at me before I left.  Anyway, my plan is to catch enough of the snakes in our neighborhood to calm down my neighbors, so they won't get the landlady to have someone kill them, and then release them into the wild a good 10 miles or so down the road, where, hopefully, they won't encounter too many humans. |
|
|
| I CAUGHT ONE!! |
[May. 12th, 2009|02:05 pm] |
I caught a snake earlier! One of those that have been plaguing my yard for some time.
Lately, I haven't been seeing them much. But today, there was a virtual stampede of them over at one of the neighbor's house. When they saw me, they headed straight for the lady's shrubs and got away.
But later, I spotted a small one sticking his head up out of the grass. I inched close to him - and nearly ran away a couple of times, when I spotted a larger one in the area. Then I caught him! I used a Gopher to snag him, and put him in a tall trash can. He almost managed to jump out a couple of times. But once I got him safely stowed, I hauled him off to a stream way outside of town and let him go.
He was a pretty color green, too, with black speckles and the yellow stripes down his back and along his side, and about 20-24 inches long. Unfortunately, I couldn't find my camera, so I didn't get any pics of him. He's a Thamnophis sirtalis, I'm pretty sure, a common garter snake.
But at least he's safe. My neighbors have about had it with the snake population in the area, and have asked our landlady to do something about it. She'll probably have someone try to kill them, but I hope not. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|